Sacrificing the Few to Save the Many: The Moral Economy of Resettlement to Norway
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.41744Keywords:
Norway, resettlement, moral economy, moral dilemma, human sufferingAbstract
This article explores how Norwegian resettlement officers navigate moral dilemmas when selecting refugees who are deemed both deserving of protection and too vulnerable, costly, or risky to resettle. It analyzes resettlement officers’ moral distress, discretionary power, and coping strategies and develops a moral economy perspective on refugee resettlement in a universalist welfare state. The analysis reveals that these dilemmas reflect fundamental contradictions within the resettlement system, at the intersection of humanitarian commitment, national legal and social norms, and municipal capacity. These moral tensions create a space where human suffering is neither ignored nor easily resolved but continuously present.
References
Afroz, S. (2023). Status framework of hierarchy. Journal of Undergraduate Studies at Trent (JUST), 8(1), 76–81. https://ojs.trentu.ca/index.php/just/article/view/534
Askim, J., & Steen, A. (2020). Trading refugees: The governance of refugee settlement in a decentralized welfare state. Scandinavian Political Studies, 43(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12158
Bendixsen, S., Bringslid, M. B., & Vike, H. (2017). Egalitarianism in Scandinavia: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59791-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59791-1
Bjørkhaug, I., & Brækkevold, K. M. (2025). Navigating vulnerability and integration: Refugee resettlement from Rwanda to third countries under the medical needs category. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 44(1), 106–125. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdae017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdae017
Böhm, F., Ramsøy, I. J., & Suter, B. (2021). Norms and values in refugee resettlement: A literature review of resettlement to the EU (Current Themes in IMER Research 21:1). Malmø University. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1537530/FULLTEXT01.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.24834/isbn.9789178771776
Brekke, J.-P., Paasche, E., Espegren, A., & Sandvik, K. B. (2021). Selection criteria in refugee resettlement: Balancing vulnerability and future integration in eight resettlement countries (Report no. 2021:3). Institutt for Samfunnsforskning. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2758744
Brochmann, G., & Hagelund, A. (2011). Migrants in the Scandinavian welfare state: The emergence of a social policy problem. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 1(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10202-011-0003-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10202-011-0003-3
Brodkin, E. Z. (1997). Inside the welfare contract: Discretion and accountability in state welfare administration. Social Service Review, 71(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1086/604228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/604228
Brodkin, E. Z. (2012). Reflections on street‐level bureaucracy: Past, present, and future. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 940–949. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02657.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02657.x
De Boer, T., & Zieck, M. (2020). The legal abyss of discretion in the resettlement of refugees: Cherry-picking and the lack of due process in the EU. International Journal of Refugee Law, 32(1), 54–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeaa005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeaa005
Fassin, D. (2009). Les économies morales revisitées. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 64(6), 1235–1266. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0395264900027499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0395264900027499
Fassin, D. (2011). A contribution to the critique of moral reason. Anthropological Theory, 11(4), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499611429901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499611429901
Fassin, D. (2012). Humanitarian reason: A moral history of the present (R. Gomme, Trans.). University of California Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pptmk
Huysmans, J. (2000). The European Union and the securitization of migration. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(5), 751–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00263
Jameton, A. (1984). Nursing practice: The ethical issues. Prentice-Hall.
Leboeuf, L., Brun, C., Lidén, H., Marchetti, S., Nakache, D., & Sarolea, S. (Eds.). (2025). Between protection and harm: Negotiated vulnerabilities in asylum laws and bureaucracies. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69808-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69808-8
Lillevik, R., Weiss, N., & Bjørkhaug, I. (2025). Inter-organizational decision-making in Norwegian refugee resettlement. Nordic Welfare Research, 10(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.18261/nwr.10.4.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/nwr.10.4.6
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service (30th anniv. ed.). Russell Sage Foundation. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610446631
Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors : Stories from the front lines of public service. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11924 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11924
Maynard‐Moody, S., & Portillo, S. (2010). Street‐level bureaucracy theory. In R. F. Durant (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy (pp. 252–277). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238958.003.0011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238958.003.0011
McCarthy, J. (2013). Nursing Ethics and moral distress: The story so far. Nursing Ethics, 20(2). https://journals.sagepub.com/page/nej/collections/special-issues/moral-distress
Paasche, E., Soennecken, D., & Tanotra, R. (2025). Selecting refugees for resettlement to Norway and Canada: Vulnerability, integration and discretion. I L. Leboeuf, C. Brun, H. Lidén, S. Marchetti, D. Nakache, & S. Sarolea (Eds.), Between protection and harm: Negotiated vulnerabilities in asylum laws and bureaucracies (pp. 117–139). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69808-8_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69808-8_6
Schultz, J. (2022). The temporary turn in Norwagian asylum law and practice (CMI report no. 5). Chr. Michelsen Institute. https://www.cmi.no/publications/8445-the-temporary-turn-in-norwegian-asylum-law-and-practice
Thunman, E. (2016). Coping with moral stress in the Swedish public services. Old Site of Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 6(3), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v6i3.5528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v6i3.5528
Tjelmeland, H., & Brochmann, G. (2003). Norsk innvandringshistorie: I globaliseringens tid, 1940–2000 [Norwegian history of migration: In times of globalization]. Pax Forlag.
Tummers, L. L. G, Bekkers, V., Vink, E., & Musheno, M. (2015). Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1099–1126. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu056
UNHCR. (n.d.). Refugee data finder. Accessed March 18, 2026, from https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics/download?url=crQc2t
UNHCR. (2021). Country chapter—Norway. In UNHCR resettlement handbook. https://www.unhcr.org/media/unhcr-resettlement-handbook-country-chapter-norway
UNHCR. (2023). Resettlement handbook. https://www.unhcr.org/resettlement-handbook/
UNHCR. (2024). UNHCR projected global resettlement needs: 2025. https://www.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/projected-global-resettlement-needs-2025.pdf
Weiss, N., Djuve, A. B., Hamelink, W., & Zhang, H. (2017). Opphold i asylmottak. Konsekvenser for levekår og integrering [Staying in asylums: Consequences for living condtions and integration]. Fafo. https://www.udi.no/globalassets/global/forskning-fou_i/asylmottak/opphold-i-asylmottak.pdf
Welfens, N., & Bonjour, S. (2021). Families first? The mobilization of family norms in refugee resettlement. International Political Sociology, 15(2), 212–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olaa022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olaa022
Wohlforth, W. C., de Carvalho, B., Leira, H., & Neumann, I. B. (2018). Moral authority and status in international relations: Good states and the social dimension of status seeking. Review of International Studies, 44(3), 526–546. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210517000560 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210517000560
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nerina Weiss
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Refuge authors retain the copyright over their work, and license it to the general public under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License International (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows for non-commercial use, reproduction and adaption of the material in any medium or format, with proper attribution. For general information on Creative Commons licences, visit the Creative Commons site. For the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, review the human readable summary.
