The Cautious Politics of “Humanizing” Refugee Research

Jonathan Darling

doi:10.25071/1920-7336.40798

Authors

Jonathan Darling Department of Geography, Durham University, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.40798

Keywords:

humanization, refugee studies, refugee mobility, race

Abstract

In this intervention, I reflect on what it may mean to ‘humanize’ refugee research. The assumption often made is that ‘humanizing’ can arise through a concern with the particularity of the individual, through drawing from ‘the mass’ the narrative of the singular and employing this as a means to identify, , and potentially understand others. Yet such a move risks a reliance on creating relations of empathy and compassion that elide political responses to dehumanization and often relies on a assumption of what constitutes the category of “the human,” an assumption that has been critically challenged by post-colonial writing.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Arendt, H. (1958). The origins of totalitarianism. Meridian.

Bleiker, R., Campbell, D., Hutchison, E., & Nicholson, X. (2013). The visual dehumanisation of refugees. Australian Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2013.840769

Burrell, K., & Hörschelmann, K. (2019). Perilous journeys: Visualising the racialised “refugee crisis.” Antipode, 51(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12429

Collyer, M., & King, R. (2016). Narrating Europe’s migration and refugee “crisis.” Human Geography, 9(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/194277861600900201

Crawley, H. (2016). Managing the unmanageable? Understanding Europe’s response to the migration “crisis.” Human Geography, 9(2), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/194277861600900202

Crawley, H., & Skleparis, D. (2018). Refugees, migrants, neither, both: Categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe’s “migration crisis.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1348224

Darling, J. (2014). From hospitality to presence. Peace Review, 26(2), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2014.906872

Darling, J. (2018). The fragility of welcome. Fennia, 196(2), 220–224. https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.75756

Dempsey, K. E., & McDowell, S. (2019). Disaster depictions and geopolitical representations in Europe’s migration “crisis.” Geoforum, 98(1), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/194277861600900202

El-Enany, N. (2016). Aylan Kurdi: The human refugee. Law Critique, 27(1), 13–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-015-9175-7

Esposito, R. (2012). Third person. Polity Press.

Forgiarini, M., Gallucci, M., & Malavita, A. (2011). Racism and the empathy for pain on our skin. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00108

George, R. (2018, May 23). Exile or refuge? Lights in the Distance overturns the spurious distinction. New Statesman. https://www.newstatesman.com/2018/05/daniel-trilling-lights-dark-exile-refuge-borders-europe-review

Gill, N. (2016). Nothing personal? Geographies of governing and activism in the British asylum system. Wiley-Blackwell.

Gill, N. (2018). The suppression of welcome. Fennia, 196(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.70040

Greussing, E., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Shifting the refugee narrative? An automated frame analysis of Europe’s 2015 refugee crisis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(11), 1749–1774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1282813

Hartley, L., & Fleay, C. (2017). “We are like animals”: Negotiating dehumanising experiences of asylum-seeker policies in the Australian community Refugee Survey Quarterly, 36(4), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdx010

Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4

Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S. (2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045

Ibrahim, Y., & Howarth, A. (2015). Sounds of the jungle: Rehumanizing the migrant. JOMEC Journal, 7, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18573/j.2015.10008

Jazeel, T. (2019). Singularity: A manifesto for incomparable geographies. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 40(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12265

Jones, R. (2016). Violent borders: Refugees and the right to move. Verso.

Kingsley, P. (2017). The new odyssey: The story of Europe’s refugee crisis. Faber & Faber.

Kirkwood, S. (2017). The humanisation of refugees: A discourse analysis of UK parliamentary debates on the European refugee “crisis.” Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 27(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2298

McDonald-Gibson, C. (2016). Cast away: Stories of survival from Europe’s refugee crisis. Portobello Books.

Migrant Voice. (2014). Migration and the media. https://www.migrantvoice.org/design2020/img/upload/1._Migration-and-the-Media-2014_.pdf

Nyers, P. (2006). Rethinking refugees: Beyond states of emergency. Routledge.

Papastergiadis, N. (2009). Wog zombie: The de- and re-humanisation of migrants, from mad dogs to cyborgs. Cultural Studies Review, 15(2), 147–178. https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v15i2.2043

Sales, R. (2002). The deserving and the undeserving? Refugees, asylum seekers and welfare in Britain. Critical Social Policy, 22(3), 456–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/026101830202200305

Smith, D. (2016) Refugee stories: Seven personal journeys behind the headlines. Instant Apostle.

Smith, K., & Waite, L. (2019) New and enduring narratives of vulnerability: Rethinking stories about the figure of the refugee. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(13), 2289–2307. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1496816

Trilling, D. (2018). Lights in the distance: Exile and refuge at the borders of Europe. Picador.

Weheliye, A G. (2014). Habeas viscus: Racializing assemblages, biopolitics, and black feminist theories of the human. Duke University Press.

Wilson, H. F. (2014). The possibilities of tolerance: Intercultural dialogue in a multicultural Europe. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(5), 852–868. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13063p