'I Want to Give Something Back': Social Support and Reciprocity in the Lives of Young Refugees

Authors

  • Caroline Schmitt Alpen-Adria-University, Klagenfurt, Austria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.40690

Keywords:

Germany, Syrian refugees, young people, support, Coping Strategy, reciprocity

Abstract

This article analyzes the support relationships of 10 asylum-seeking young people who fled to Germany between 2010 and 2015. It highlights their wish for reciprocity as a need in their country of destination and expands upon Sahlin’s typology of reciprocal relationships (generalized, balanced, and negative reciprocity) by the type of “refused reciprocity.” “Refused reciprocity” occurs when people are keen to reciprocate for support they have received, but they live in environments that restrict their agency. The article argues that participation means not only provision of support, but creation of opportunities for people to experience themselves as self-effective actors. They become self-effective when they can cope successfully with new and difficult situations on their own.

Author Biography

Caroline Schmitt, Alpen-Adria-University, Klagenfurt, Austria

Caroline Schmitt is a professor of migration and inclusion research at Alpen-Adria-University, Klagenfurt, Austria. She can be reached at caroline.schmitt@aau.at.

References

Barnes, D. M., & Aguilar, R. (2007). Community social support for Cuban refugees in Texas. Qualitative Health Research, 17(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306297756

Blau, P. M. ([1968] 2005). Sozialer Austausch. In F. Adloff & S. Mau (Eds.), Vom Geben und Nehmen. Zur Soziologie der Reziprozität (pp. 125–137). Campus.

Bowling, N. A., Beehr, Terry A., & Swader, W. M. (2005). Giving and receiving social support at work: The roles of personality and reciprocity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.08.004

Breithecker, R., & Stöckinger, M. (2020). Ist Geben seliger als Nehmen? Die Bedeutung von Gaben und Gegengaben in den Beziehungen von bürgerschaftlich engagierten und geflüchteten Menschen. In A. Schulz & T. Schwertel, (Eds.), Der lange Sommer der Flucht – 2015 und danach (pp. 73–97). Barbara Budrich.

Brown, S. L., Nesse, R. M., Vinokur, A. D., & Smith, D. M. (2003). Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it. Psychological Science, 14(4), 320–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–9280.14461

Bundesamt für Migration und Flucht (BAMF). (2019). Aktuelle Zahlen. March 2019. https://www.bamf.de/SiteGlobals/Forms/Suche/Expertensuche_Flyout_Formular.html?templateQueryString=2Aktuelle+Zahlen+zu+Asyl2&sortOrder=dateOfIssue_dt+desc&pageLocale=de

Dunbar, M., Ford, G., &, Hunt, K. (1998). Why is the receipt of social support associated with increased psychological distress? Psychology & Health, 13(3), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449808407308

Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2092623

Gouldner, A. W. ([1984] 2005). Etwas gegen nichts. Reziprozität und Asymmetrie. In F. Adloff & S. Mau (Eds.), Vom Geben und Nehmen. Zur Soziologie der Reziprozität (pp. 109–123). Campus.

Hamann, U., & Karakayali, S. (2016): Practicing Willkommenskultur: Migration and solidarity in Germany. Intersections, 2(4), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v2i4.296

Institute of Research in Social Pedagogy Mainz (ism). (2019). Entwicklung der jugendhilferechtlichen Zuständigkeit für umA im bundesweiten und rheinland-pfälzischen Vergleich. https://b-umf.de/src/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019_01_03_uma-meldung.pdf

Jung, J. (1990). The role of reciprocity in social support. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1103_2

Kohli, R. K. S. (2011). Working to ensure safety, belonging and success for unaccompanied asylum-seeking children. Child Abuse Review, 20, 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.1182

Maiter, S., Simich, L., Jacobson, N., & Wise, J. (2008). Reciprocity: An ethic for community-based participatory action research. Action Research, 6(3), 305–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476750307083720

Mauss, M. ([1968] 2005). Die Gabe. In F. Adloff & S. Mau (Eds.), Vom Geben und Nehmen. Zur Soziologie der Reziprozität (pp. 61–72). Campus.

Nelson, M. K. (2000). Single mothers and social support: The commitment to, and retreat from, reciprocity. Qualitative Sociology, 23(3), 291–317.

Neufeld, A., & Harrison, M. J. (1995). Reciprocity and social support in caregivers’ relationships: Variations and consequences. Qualitative Health Research, 5(3), 348–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239500500306

Przyborski, A., & Wohlrab-Sahr, M. (2010). Qualitative Sozialforschung (3rd ed.). Oldenbourg.

Sahlin, M. D. ([1965] 1999). Zur Soziologie des primitiven Tauschs. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 9(2), 149–178. Shumaker, S. A., & Brownell, A. (1984). Toward a theory of social support: Closing conceptual gaps. Journal of Social Issues, 40(4), 11–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540–4560.1984.tb01105.x

Siim, B., Saarinen A., & Krasteva A. (2019). Citizens’ activism and solidarity movements in contemporary Europe: Contending with populism. In B. Siim, A. Krasteva, & A. Saarinen (Eds.), Citizens’ Activism and Solidarity Movements (pp. 1–24). Palgrave Macmillan.

Simmel, G. ([1908] 2005). Exkurs über Treue und Dankbarkeit. In F. Adloff & S. Mau (Eds.), Vom Geben und Nehmen. Zur Soziologie der Reziprozität (pp. 95–108). Campus.

Smith, A. (2016). “They have become my family”: Reciprocity and responsiveness in a volunteer-led proram for refugees in migrants. ArtsPraxis, 3, 71–86.

Stegbauer, C. (2011). Reziprozität. Einführung in soziale Formen der Gegenseitigkeit (2nd ed.). Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften (VS).

Stewart, M., Anderson, J., Beiser, M., Mwakarimba, E., Neufeld, A., Simich, L., & Spitzer, D. (2008). Multicultural meanings of social support among immigrants and refugees. International Migration, 46(3), 123–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14682435.2008.00464.x

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1996). Grounded Theory. Beltz. Takizawa, T., Kondo, T., Sakihara, S., Ariizumi, M., Watanabe, N., & Oyama, H. (2006). Stress buffering effects of social support on depressive symptoms in middle age: Reciprocity and community mental health. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 60, 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440–1819.2006.01579.x

UNHCR (2020). Figures at a glance. https://www.unhcr.org/figures-at-a-glance.html

Väänänen, A., Buunk, B. P., Kivimäki, M., Pentti, J., & Vahtera, J. (2005). When it is better to give than to receive: Long- term health effects of perceived reciprocity in support exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(2), 176–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.176

Wellmann, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 558–588. http://dx-.doi.org/10.1086/229572

Williams, H. (1995). There are no free gifts! Social support and the need for reciprocity. Human Organization, 54(4), 401–409. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.54.4.w233493122q420v7

Downloads

Published

2021-04-18 — Updated on 2021-04-26

Versions

How to Cite

Schmitt, C. (2021). ’I Want to Give Something Back’: Social Support and Reciprocity in the Lives of Young Refugees. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 37(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.40690 (Original work published April 18, 2021)