Humanitarian Interventions as Practises of Statecraft: Re-Crafting State Sovereignty in Refugee Crises

Authors

  • Nevzat Soguk Department of Political Science, University of Hawaii at Manoa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.21194

Keywords:

humanitarian intervention, refugees, sovereignty, statism, humanitarianism

Abstract

This study argues that humanitarian interventions are not undertaken merely to alleviate the sufferings of people under duress such as refugees. Beyond humanitarianism, they are activities of statist governance-practices of statecraft oriented to re-articulate and re-craft state sovereignty and the hierarchy it signifies, that is, the hierarchy of citizen/nation/state, not only as natural but also as necessary to the peaceful, stable, and secure organization of local and global politics. In as much as humanitarian interventions target refugees as objects of intervention, they appropriate refugees to the task of statecraft; refugees become not only the manifestation of the difficulties for the sovereign state, but also the site of statist practices, which, attendant upon refugees, endeavour continuously to re-articulate the state-centric imagination of life possibilities in local and global interactions. In the process, humanitarianism is typically subordinated to the contingencies of statism in the late 20th Century.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

1996-04-01

How to Cite

Soguk, N. (1996). Humanitarian Interventions as Practises of Statecraft: Re-Crafting State Sovereignty in Refugee Crises. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 15(3), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.21194

Similar Articles

<< < 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.