Claim Types in Canada’s Refugee Determination System

An Empirical Snapshot (2013–2021)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.41139

Keywords:

Canada, refugee law, empirical, quantitative, political opinion, gender, sexual orientation, religion, race, ethnicity

Abstract

This article overviews outcomes in different types of refugee claims in Canada. It critiques standard legal research methodologies in the refugee law field due to skews in publication practices. To address these skews, the article employs empirical quantitative research methods using administrative tribunal data and computational methods. It provides a snapshot of refugee claim numbers, countries of origin, claim categories, and outcomes. The article then underscores the benefits of supplementing doctrinal legal research with empirical quantitative research methods, outlines barriers to the adoption of such methods, and offers guidance and tools to assist other researchers in overcoming those barriers.



Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Sean Rehaag, Centre for Refugee Studies & Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada

Sean Rehaag is Director of York University’s Centre for Refugee Studies, Director of the Refugee Law Laboratory, and Associate Professor at Osgoode Hall Law School. He can be reached at srehaag@osgoode.yorku.ca.



References

Access to Information Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. A-1, s. 19(1).

Alarie, B., & Aidid, A. (2023). The legal singularity: How artificial intelligence can make law radically better. University of Toronto Press.

Arbel, E. (2013). The culture of rights protection in Canadian refugee law: Examining the domestic violence cases. McGill Law Journal, 58(3), 729–771.

Atak, I., Alroh, Z. A., & Ellis, C. (2021). Expanding refugee ineligibility: Canada’s response to secondary refugee movements. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(3), 2593–2612. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaa103

Bains v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), (1990) 47 Admin LR 317.

Bhuyan, R., Vargas, A., & Píntín-Perez, M. (2016). Fleeing domestic violence from a “safe” country? Refugee determination for Mexican asylum-seekers in Canada. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 32(3), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.40373

Blender, E., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In FAccT ’21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610–623). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Cameron, H. E. (2018). Refugee law’s fact-finding crisis: Truth, risk, and the wrong mistake. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108551908

Cameron, H. E., Goldfarb, A., & Morris, L. (2022). Artificial intelligence for a reduction of false denials in refugee claims. Journal of Refugee Studies, 35(1), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feab054

Canada (Attorney General) v. Ward, [1993] 2 SCR 689.

Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Zazai, 2004 FCA 89.

Chawinga, W. D., & Zinn, S. (2019). Global perspectives of research data sharing: A systematic literature review. Library & Information Science Research, 41(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.04.004

Constitution Act, 1867, 30 & 31 Vict, c. 3, reprinted in R.S.C. 1985, App. II, No. 5.

Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, 28 July 1951, 189 U.N.T.S. 150 (entered into force 22 April 1954).

Daly, P., & Orct, B. (2022). Artificial intelligence accountability of public administration in Canada (Ottawa Faculty of Law working paper no. 2022). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4266365

Dauvergne, C., & Lindy, H. (2019). Excluding women. International Journal of Refugee Law, 31(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eez015

Dorta-González, P., González-Betancor, S. M., & Dorta-González, M. I. (2021). To what extent is researchers’ data-sharing motivated by formal mechanisms of recognition and credit? Scientometrics, 126, 2209–2225. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.05636

Fecher, B., Friesike, B. S., & Hebing, M. (2015). What drives academic data sharing? PLoS ONE, 10(2), Article e0118053. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118053

Federal Court. (2015, June 19). Notice to the parties and the profession: Publication of decisions of precedential value. https://perma.cc/8TXU-2XNQ

Federal Court. (2018, June 1). Notice to the parties and the profession: Publication of court decisions. https://perma.cc/7XSX-R4SR

Federal Court. (2022, January 27). Activity summary—January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021. https://www.fct-cf.gc.ca/en/pages/about-the-court/reports-and-statistics/statistics-december-31-2021

Federal Court of Appeal. (2023). Statistics: 2023. https://www.fca-caf.ca/en/pages/about-the-court/statistics

Federal Court Rules, (1998) SOR/98-106.

Frankenreiter, J., & Livermore, M. (2020). Computational methods in legal analysis. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-052720-12843

Government of Canada. (2022, February). CIMM—Chinook development and implementation in decision-making, February 15 & 17. https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/transparency/committees/cimm-feb-15-17-2022/chinook-development-implementation-decision-making.html

Government of Canada. (2023, March 27). Canada–US safe third country agreement. https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/mandate/policies-operational-instructions-agreements/agreements/safe-third-country-agreement.html

Grant, A. G., & Rehaag, S. (2016). Unappealing: An assessment of the limits on appeal rights in Canada’s new refugee determination system. University of British Columbia Law Review, 49(1), 203–274. https://commons.allard.ubc.ca/ubclawreview/vol49/iss1/6

Grey, C. (2016). Thinkable: The Charter and refugee law after Appulonappa and B010. The Supreme Court Law Review, 76, 111–139. https://doi.org/10.60082/2563-8505.1331

Hajiyeva v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2021 FC 922.

Hildebrandt, M. (2018). Law as computation in the era of artificial legal intelligence: Speaking law to the power of statistics. University of Toronto Law Journal, 68, 12–35. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2983045

Immigration and Refugee Board. (2008, June). Members decisions: Explanatory note. https://ccrweb.ca/files/7.irb_explanatory_note.pdf

Immigration and Refugee Board. (2020, December 31). Assessment of credibility in claims for refugee protection. https://irb.gc.ca/en/legal-policy/legal-concepts/Pages/Credib.aspx

Immigration and Refugee Board. (2021a, February 5). Protecting privacy when releasing statistical information: Small value suppression. https://irb.gc.ca/en/statistics/Pages/small-value-suppression.aspx

Immigration and Refugee Board. (2021b, December 17). Guideline 9: Proceedings before the IRB involving sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, and sex cdharacteristics. https://irb.gc.ca/en/legal-policy/policies/Pages/GuideDir09.aspx

Immigration and Refugee Board. (2022, July 7–8). Memorandum of understanding between the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB) and Sean Rehaag and his research team. https://github.com/Refugee-Law-Lab/claim_types_2013-2021/blob/main/IRB_Data_Sharing_Agreement_2022.pdf

Immigration and Refugee Board. (2023, August 23). Refugee appeals statistics. https://irb.gc.ca/en/statistics/appeals/Pages/index.aspx

Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27.

Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (2002), SOR/2002-227.

Jacob, T., & Oswin, N. (2022). Trans migrations: Seeking refuge in “safe haven” Toronto. Canadian Geographies, 67(2), 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12811

Kaushal, A., & Dauvergne, C. (2011). The growing culture of exclusion: Trends in Canadian refugee exclusions. International Journal of Refugee Law, 23(1), 54–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeq046

Keung, N. (2021, November 15). Canada is refusing more study permits. Is new AI technology to blame? Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2021/11/15/canada-is-refusing-more-study-permits-is-new-ai-technology-to-blame.html

Kreishan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FCA 223.

LaViolette, N. (1997). The immutable refugees: Sexual orientation in Canada (A.G.) v. Ward. University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review, 55(1), 1–41. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1803862

Liew, J. C. Y. (2020). The good, the bad and the ugly: A preliminary assessment of whether the Vavilov framework adequately addresses concerns of marginalized communities in the immigration law context. Canadian Bar Review, 98(2), 398–429. https://cbr.cba.org/index.php/cbr/article/view/4618

MacIntosh, C. (2005). When “feminist beliefs” became credible as “political opinions”: Returning to a key moment in Canadian refugee law. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 17(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1353/jwl.2006.0013

MacIntosh, C. (2009). Domestic violence and gender-based persecution: How refugee adjudicators judge women seeking refuge from spousal violence—And why reform is needed. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 26(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.32085

MacIntosh, C. (2011). Domestic violence and gender-based persecution: How refugee adjudicators judge women seeking refuge from spousal wiolence—And why reform is needed. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 26(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.32085

Macklin, A. (2002). Mr. Suresh and the evil twin. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 20(4), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.21269

McGill, J., Bouclin, S., & Salyzyn, A. (2017). Mobile and web-based legal apps: Opportunities, risks and information gaps. Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, 15(2), 229–263. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2960207

McGill, J., & Salyzyn, A. (2021). Judging by numbers: How will judicial analytics impact the justice system and its stakeholders? Dalhousie Law Journal, 44(1), 249–284. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652468

Millbank, J., & Vogl, A. (2018). Adjudicating fear of witchcraft claims in refugee law. Journal of Law and Society, 45(3), 370–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12120

Molnar, P. (2020). Technological testing grounds: Migration management experiments and reflections from the ground up. EDRi & Refugee Law Lab. https://edri.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Technological-Testing-Grounds.pdf

Molnar, P., & Gill, L. (2022). Bots at the gate: A human rights analysis of automated decision-making in Canada’s immigration and refugee system. The Citizen Lab. https://citizenlab.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/IHRP-Automated-Systems-Report-Web-V2.pdf

Murray, D. B. (2015). Real queer? Sexual orientation and gender identity refugees in the Canadian refugee apparatus. Rowman & Littlefield International.

Privacy Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. P-21.

Raso, J. (2020). Unity in the eye of the beholder? Reasons for decision in theory and practice in the Ontario Works program. University of Toronto Law Journal, 70(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.2018-0022

Raso, J. (2021). AI and administrative law. In F. Martin-Bariteau & T. Scassa (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and the governance of automated decision-making: A critical look at Canada’s directive on automated decision-making (ch. 7). LexisNexis Canada. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3734656

Refugee Law Laboratory. (n.d.). Refugee law lab reporter. https://refugeelab.ca/rllr/

Rehaag, S. (2008). Troubling patterns in Canadian refugee adjudication. Ottawa Law Review, 39(2), 335–365. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1468717

Rehaag, S. (2011). Do women refugee judges really make a difference? An empirical analysis of gender and outcomes in Canadian refugee determinations. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 23(2), 627–660. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjwl.23.2.627

Rehaag, S. (2012). Judicial review of refugee determinations: The luck of the draw? Queen’s Law Journal, 38(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2027517

Rehaag, S. (2017). Sexual orientation in Canada’s revised refugee determination system: An empirical snapshot. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 29(2), 259–289. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjwl.29.2.259

Rehaag, S. (2019). Judicial review of refugee determinations (II): Revisiting the luck of the draw. Queen’s Law Journal, 45(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3249723

Rehaag, S. (2020). 2019 refugee claim data and IRB member recognition rates. Refugee Law Lab. https://refugeelab.ca/refugee-claim-data-2019

Rehaag, S., & Thériault, P.-A. (2022). Judgments v reasons in federal court refugee claim judicial reviews: A bad precedent. Dalhousie Law Journal, 45(1), 185–226. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3920722

Rousseau, C., Crepeau, F., Foxen, P., & Houle, F. (2002). The complexity of determining refugeehood: A multidisciplinary analysis of the decision-making process of the Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board. Journal of Refugee Studies, 15(1), 43–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/15.1.43

Scassa, T. (2021). Administrative law and the governance of automated decision-making: A critical look at Canada’s directive on automated decision-making. UBC Law Review, 54(1), 251–298. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3722192

Simeon, J. (2015). The application and interpretation of international humanitarian law and international criminal law in the exclusion of those refugee claimants who have committed war crimes and/or crimes against humanity in Canada. International Journal of Refugee Law, 27(1), 75–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eev001

Smith, C. D. (2023). Policy change, threat perception, and mobility catalysts: The Trump administration as driver of asylum migration to Canada. International Migration Review, 57(4), 1678–1709. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183221112418

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (2021). Tri-agency statement of principles on digital data management. Government of Canada. https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/interagency-research-funding/policies-and-guidelines/research-data-management/tri-agency-statement-principles-digital-data-management

Supreme Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. S-26.

Sutherland, S. (2022). Legal data and information in practice: How data and the law interact. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003127307

Thomkinson, S. (2018). Who are you afraid of and why? Inside the black box of refugee tribunals. Canadian Public Administration, 61(2), 184–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12275

Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. (2020, October 6). Privacy implementation notice 2020-03: Protecting privacy when releasing information about a small number of individuals. https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-secretariat/services/access-information-privacy/access-information-privacy-notices/2020-03-protecting-privacy-releasing-information-about-small-number-individuals.html

UNHCR. (2021). Global trends: Forced displacement in 2020. https://www.unhcr.org/60b638e37.pdf

UNHCR. (2022). Refugee data finder. https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics/download/?url=Buzla7>

Zhang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FCA 168.

Published

2024-06-17

How to Cite

Rehaag, S. (2024). Claim Types in Canada’s Refugee Determination System: An Empirical Snapshot (2013–2021). Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 40(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.41139

Similar Articles

<< < 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.