Temporary Protection and the Refugee Convention in Australia, Denmark, and Germany

Authors

  • Fethi Mansouri Deakin University, Australia
  • Michael Leach Swinburne University, Australia
  • Amy Nethery Deakin University, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.30615

Keywords:

Australia, Denmark, Germany, Refugee Convention, policy analysis, temporary protection, substitute protection

Abstract

This paper reports on a comparative study of temporary protection (TP) mechanisms in Australia and selected European jurisdictions. Specifically, it analyzes policy developments and trends in the use of TP mechanisms in Denmark, Germany, and Australia through a systematic examination of the evolution of “substitute protection” mechanisms; their implications for “effective protection” and their impacts on key stakeholders. The policy analyses are augmented by interviews and survey questionnaires with key NGO service providers in the three target jurisdictions. The paper argues that the traditional link between Refugee Convention protection and national territorial jurisdiction and responsibility is being undermined by extraterritorial processing and offshoring arrangements.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Published

2010-10-09

How to Cite

Mansouri, F., Leach, M., & Nethery, A. (2010). Temporary Protection and the Refugee Convention in Australia, Denmark, and Germany. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 26(1), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.30615

Issue

Section

General Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.