Reforming the Canadian Refugee Determination System

Authors

  • Martin Collacott Fraser Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.34358

Keywords:

Canada, 1951 Refugee Convention, refugee policy, resettlement, asylum, refugee determination, safe third country, human trafficking, public opinion

Abstract

If Canadian refugee policy is to serve interests of Canadians as well as those of genuine refugees in an effective manner, far more radical changes will be needed than have been attempted to date. They must include the introduction of robust safe third country designations, a review of the 1985 Singh decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, and possible withdrawal by Canada of its accession to the 1951 UN Refugee Convention. Other measures should also be considered such as placing an annual limit on the intake of refugees from overseas combined with that of successful in-country asylum seekers as well as establishing provision for temporary refugee status in Canada in addition to permanent resettlement. Measures should be taken to return Canada to its role primarily as a resettlement country for refugees selected abroad and not one that accommodates large numbers of asylum seekers making claims on our territory. With strong public backing for major changes, political parties that oppose such reforms will do so at the risk of losing electoral support.

Metrics

PDF views
751
Jan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013Jul 2013Jan 2014Jul 2014Jan 2015Jul 2015Jan 2016Jul 2016Jan 2017Jul 2017Jan 2018Jul 2018Jan 2019Jul 2019Jan 2020Jul 2020Jan 2021Jul 2021Jan 2022Jul 2022Jan 2023Jul 2023Jan 2024Jul 2024Jan 2025Jul 2025Jan 202633
|

Published

2011-09-30

How to Cite

Collacott, M. (2011). Reforming the Canadian Refugee Determination System. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 27(1), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.34358

Issue

Section

Feature Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.