Bordering on Conventional: The Politics of Iraqi Resettlement to the US and Europe, 2003–2011

Authors

  • Chantal E. Berman Brown University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.36094

Keywords:

United States, European Union, Iraqi refugees, US foreign policy, Common European Asylum System, CEAS, refugee policy, asylum, resettlement

Abstract

Of some 2.5 million Iraqi citizens internationally displaced in the wake of Operation Iraqi Freedom, less than 100,000 have achieved permanent international resettlement. This paper compares US and EU policies regulating the selection and admission of Iraqi refugees since 2003, focusing on the divergent political priorities and structural considerations underpinning variations in resettlement levels during this time. I argue that US resettlement of Iraqi refugees is primarily an element of foreign policy, defined by strategic objectives in Iraq and the surrounding region, whereas admissions to the EU reflect ongoing intra-European debates surrounding the construction and modification of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS). Whereas resettlement to the US increased drastically following a “strategic” reframing of the Iraqi refugee crisis in 2007, failures in the implementation of CEAS’s “standardization” agenda, compounded by enhanced European restrictions on refugee movement, have limited Iraqi admissions to Europe during this time.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Published

2012-11-08

How to Cite

Berman, C. E. (2012). Bordering on Conventional: The Politics of Iraqi Resettlement to the US and Europe, 2003–2011. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 28(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.36094

Issue

Section

Feature Articles